Skip to content
The Algorithm
vs CGI Group×Compliance Infrastructure
Service comparison

CGI Group’s Compliance Infrastructure vs. ours

CGI Group's approach to Compliance Infrastructure reflects their broader delivery model: large teams, long timelines, and a scope that expands with the engagement rather than resolving it. There is a more precise model.

Their Model

How CGI Group delivers Compliance Infrastructure

CGI Group's approach to Compliance Infrastructure reflects their broader delivery model: large teams, long timelines, and a scope that expands with the engagement rather than resolving it. UK NHS National Programme for IT: CGI (as Logica, then post-acquisition) involved in the £12.7B NHS IT programme that was scrapped in 2011 after a decade of failure — the largest abandoned public IT programme in history

Compliance Infrastructure requires a specific kind of engineering precision that generalist delivery models do not produce. The capabilities required — Compliance framework architecture mapping, Automated audit trail generation, Policy-as-code enforcement via ALICE — are not skills that scale with headcount. They require engineers who have delivered these systems in production environments.

Our Model

How we deliver Compliance Infrastructure

Our Compliance Infrastructure practice deploys teams with production experience in the specific capabilities this service requires. Our compliance teams map your regulatory landscape before writing a single line of code. ALICE enforces compliance at every commit — making it mechanically impossible to ship non-compliant code. Audit documentation is generated as a byproduct of the build, not assembled afterward.

Fixed-price delivery with defined milestones. The first milestone is always a working system component — not a document. The engagement closes with full IP transfer: source code, documentation, and the operational capability for your team to run the system independently.

Compliance framework architecture mapping
Automated audit trail generation
Policy-as-code enforcement via ALICE
Cross-jurisdiction compliance orchestration
Side by Side

CGI Group vs. The Algorithm

CGI Group
Delivery model
Large team, extended timeline, scope expansion
First deliverable
Assessment document (weeks 8-16)
Compliance
Separate workstream, periodic review
IP ownership
Licensed or retained
Cost model
Time & materials, expanding scope
VS
The Algorithm
Delivery model
Precision team, fixed price, defined scope
First deliverable
Working system component (weeks 3-5)
Compliance
Embedded in architecture, automated enforcement
IP ownership
Full transfer at close
Cost model
Fixed price per deliverable
Industries

Where Compliance Infrastructure matters most

Compare
Healthcare — Hospitals & Health Systems
Compare
Financial Services — Banking
Compare
Government & Public Sector
DECISION GUIDE

Compliance-Native Architecture Guide

Design principles and a structured checklist for building software that is compliant by default — not compliant by retrofit. For teams building in regulated industries.

X

Need Compliance Infrastructure without the CGI Group overhead?

Fixed price. Compliance-native architecture. Production in 8-16 weeks.

Start the Conversation
Related
Compare
vs CGI Group
Service
Compliance Infrastructure
Services
All Services
Compare
Healthcare — Hospitals & Health Systems
Compare
Financial Services — Banking
Get Started
Contact Us
Engage Us