Skip to content
The Algorithm
vs DXC Technology×Enterprise Modernization
Service comparison

DXC Technology’s Enterprise Modernization vs. ours

DXC Technology's approach to Enterprise Modernization reflects their broader delivery model: large teams, long timelines, and a scope that expands with the engagement rather than resolving it. There is a more precise model.

Their Model

How DXC Technology delivers Enterprise Modernization

DXC Technology's approach to Enterprise Modernization reflects their broader delivery model: large teams, long timelines, and a scope that expands with the engagement rather than resolving it. Spun off from HPE/CSC merger (2017) — has lost more than half its market value since inception, never achieved the promised integration

Enterprise Modernization requires a specific kind of engineering precision that generalist delivery models do not produce. The capabilities required — Legacy system triage and architecture assessment, Strangler-fig migration without downtime, Failed vendor implementation rescue — are not skills that scale with headcount. They require engineers who have delivered these systems in production environments.

Our Model

How we deliver Enterprise Modernization

Our Enterprise Modernization practice deploys teams with production experience in the specific capabilities this service requires. Our modernization teams inherit the mess and ship the replacement. Week 1 is triage — understanding what exists, what must be preserved, and what can be cut. We do not run 12-week discovery phases. We read the code, map the compliance obligations, and build the replacement on an aggressive timeline with a fixed price.

Fixed-price delivery with defined milestones. The first milestone is always a working system component — not a document. The engagement closes with full IP transfer: source code, documentation, and the operational capability for your team to run the system independently.

Legacy system triage and architecture assessment
Strangler-fig migration without downtime
Failed vendor implementation rescue
Technical debt quantification and elimination
Side by Side

DXC Technology vs. The Algorithm

DXC Technology
Delivery model
Large team, extended timeline, scope expansion
First deliverable
Assessment document (weeks 8-16)
Compliance
Separate workstream, periodic review
IP ownership
Licensed or retained
Cost model
Time & materials, expanding scope
VS
The Algorithm
Delivery model
Precision team, fixed price, defined scope
First deliverable
Working system component (weeks 3-5)
Compliance
Embedded in architecture, automated enforcement
IP ownership
Full transfer at close
Cost model
Fixed price per deliverable
Industries

Where Enterprise Modernization matters most

Compare
Healthcare — Hospitals & Health Systems
Compare
Financial Services — Banking
Compare
Government & Public Sector
DECISION GUIDE

Compliance-Native Architecture Guide

Design principles and a structured checklist for building software that is compliant by default — not compliant by retrofit. For teams building in regulated industries.

X

Need Enterprise Modernization without the DXC Technology overhead?

Fixed price. Compliance-native architecture. Production in 8-16 weeks.

Start the Conversation
Related
Compare
vs DXC Technology
Service
Enterprise Modernization
Services
All Services
Compare
Healthcare — Hospitals & Health Systems
Compare
Financial Services — Banking
Get Started
Contact Us
Engage Us