What KPMG gets wrong in Oceania
KPMG's delivery model was built for one regulatory environment and applied globally. In Oceania, this creates a compliance gap: UK government banned from major government audit contracts following a series of high-profile failures
Oceania's regulatory frameworks — AU Privacy Act, APPs — require local expertise embedded in the engineering, not US-centric assumptions applied with regional labels. The compliance gaps that result are discovered at audit time, not at design time.
Oceania frameworks we deploy natively
Our Oceania teams deploy with AU Privacy Act and APPs compliance as foundational architecture. The regulatory requirements of Oceania are engineering constraints from day one — before a single line of application code is written.
Engagements close with full IP transfer: source code, compliance documentation, and infrastructure configuration all pass to your team. No ongoing vendor dependency. Your team operates the system.
AU Privacy Act, APPs, MHR compliance requires regional expertise embedded in the architecture. KPMG's global delivery model produces compliance documentation. We produce compliant systems.
Oceania technology engagement: 8-20 weeks. Fixed price. Team: 8-16 engineers with Oceania regulatory qualification. Full IP transfer at close.
Vendor Lock-In Exit Guide
How to identify, quantify, and systematically eliminate dependency on KPMG in Oceania — without breaking production. Covers dependency mapping, exit plan design, and migration execution.