What PwC Technology Advisory gets wrong in United States
PwC Technology Advisory's delivery model was built for one regulatory environment and applied globally. In United States, this creates a compliance gap: StratCo scandal: use of confidential government information for commercial advantage resulted in industry-wide review of consulting firm conduct
United States's regulatory frameworks — HIPAA, SOC 2 — require local expertise embedded in the engineering, not US-centric assumptions applied with regional labels. The compliance gaps that result are discovered at audit time, not at design time.
United States frameworks we deploy natively
Our United States teams deploy with HIPAA and SOC 2 compliance as foundational architecture. The regulatory requirements of United States are engineering constraints from day one — before a single line of application code is written.
Engagements close with full IP transfer: source code, compliance documentation, and infrastructure configuration all pass to your team. No ongoing vendor dependency. Your team operates the system.
HIPAA, SOC 2, FedRAMP compliance requires regional expertise embedded in the architecture. PwC Technology Advisory's global delivery model produces compliance documentation. We produce compliant systems.
United States technology engagement: 8-20 weeks. Fixed price. Team: 8-16 engineers with United States regulatory qualification. Full IP transfer at close.
Vendor Lock-In Exit Guide
How to identify, quantify, and systematically eliminate dependency on PwC Technology Advisory in United States — without breaking production. Covers dependency mapping, exit plan design, and migration execution.