Skip to content
The Algorithm
The Algorithm/Knowledge Base/BSA / AML
Financial Compliance Framework

BSA / AML

The Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering framework require US financial institutions to detect, report, and prevent money laundering — with significant technology obligations around transaction monitoring and suspicious activity reporting.

What You Need to Know

The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) of 1970 — the foundation of the US anti-money laundering (AML) regime — requires financial institutions to maintain records and file reports that help government agencies identify and investigate money laundering and other financial crimes. Key obligations include Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs) for cash transactions over $10,000, Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) for suspicious transactions over $5,000, Customer Identification Programs (CIP), and ongoing customer due diligence (CDD). FinCEN, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network within the Treasury Department, administers the BSA.

The technology obligations of BSA/AML compliance are substantial. Transaction monitoring systems must analyze payment flows in real or near-real time to detect patterns consistent with money laundering — structuring, layering, and integration patterns that human review cannot catch at scale. Rule-based monitoring systems (alert on transactions over thresholds, alert on rapid movement of funds) are the baseline; machine learning-based systems that detect novel laundering patterns are increasingly expected by regulators. False positive rates matter operationally: a system that generates thousands of alerts per day for analyst review is not compliant in practice, even if it detects real suspicious activity.

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), effective January 2024, added beneficial ownership reporting requirements that create new data infrastructure obligations. Financial institutions must collect, verify, and maintain beneficial ownership information for legal entity customers — and must access the FinCEN Beneficial Ownership database to verify client representations. This creates new data collection flows, verification APIs, and ongoing monitoring requirements for banking technology systems.

How We Handle It

We architect BSA/AML compliance into financial services technology — designing transaction monitoring systems that balance detection effectiveness with analyst workload, implementing CIP and CDD data collection and verification workflows, integrating with FinCEN systems for CTR and SAR filing, and building the audit trail infrastructure that FinCEN and OCC examiners evaluate. Our teams understand the examination process and build systems that survive it.

Services
Service
Fintech Engineering
Service
Compliance Infrastructure
Service
Data Engineering & Analytics
Related Frameworks
AML/KYC
GLBASOXPCI-DSS
DECISION GUIDE

Compliance-Native Architecture Guide

Design principles and a structured checklist for building software that is compliant by default — not compliant by retrofit. Covers data architecture, access controls, audit trails, and vendor due diligence.

§

Compliance built at the architecture level.

Deploy a team that knows your regulatory landscape before they write their first line of code.

Start the conversation
Related
Service
Compliance Infrastructure
Service
Data Engineering & Analytics
Related Framework
AML/KYC
Related Framework
GLBA
Related Framework
SOX
Platform
ALICE Compliance Engine
Service
Compliance Infrastructure
Engagement
Surgical Strike (Tier I)
Why Switch
vs. Accenture
Get Started
Start a Conversation
Engage Us