The Challenge
Why Financial Services makes Compliance Remediation harder than it looks.
State insurance regulator examinations are identifying data security gaps in your policy and claims systems that your internal team did not flag. The examination letter gives you 90 days to remediate. The gaps span three systems, two vendors, and a data warehouse that was built before your current compliance standards. We remediate across all three in parallel.
Compliance Frameworks
soc 2
naic
gdpr
ccpa
Methodology
How We Deliver in Financial Services
Underwriting and claims systems built for modern regulation. Every engineer assigned to this engagement understands financial services before they write their first line of code. Compliance frameworks — SOC 2 and NAIC — are enforced at every commit, not assessed at the end.
✓Financial Services-qualified engineers assigned before kickoff
✓SOC 2 compliance mapped to architecture on day one
✓Production-ready output — not prototypes or proof-of-concept
✓Automated compliance monitoring through ALICE at every commit
✓Full IP ownership transferred at engagement close
Engagement Model
How We Engage
Embedded Capabilities
Platforms Deployed
These aren't products we sell. They're capabilities embedded in every engagement of this type.
ProofGrid
API Compliance Verification
Every integration our engineers build gets ProofGrid compliance monitoring as standard. It's why our API architectures don't create compliance gaps that surface during audits.
Regure
Regulatory Intelligence
Our teams deploy with live regulatory monitoring. When HIPAA, GDPR, UAE PDPL, or FCA frameworks change, Regure flags it and queues the engineering response before the client's legal team finishes reading the announcement.
ALICE
QA & Compliance Engine
This is the single most important reason our teams deliver compliance-native systems. ALICE makes it mechanically impossible to ship non-compliant code. It's not a QA phase — it's infrastructure-level enforcement at every commit.
Related